Does the Bible give conflicting advice on answering fools?

Question:

In Proverbs 26:4-5 the Bible gives conflicting advice as to whether you should answer a fool or not. Could you explain?

Answer:

First, let’s clearly set forth the problem by citing the texts in question:

Proverbs 26:4-5:

4 Do not answer a fool according to his folly,
or you will be like him yourself.

5 Answer a fool according to his folly,
or he will be wise in his own eyes.

Bible critics cite this as a particularly disturbing example of the Bible speaking out of “both sides of its mouth.” Is this a glaring contradiction in the Bible?

It is important that we bear in mind that Proverbs is not exclusively written by Solomon. Solomon writes many of the Proverbs himself, but the Proverbs are largely an edited collection. So, there are numerous uncited authors and Solomon is drawing from their works and arranging them into a single compilation of wisdom literature. That means that it was quite intentional that these two proverbs with conflicting counsel would appear right next to each other. This is not an “accidental error” but an intentional conflict.

Before resolving the conflict, let’s make sure we understand each proverb in its own right. Verse 4 teaches us that in responding to every statement of a fool you lower yourself to his level and give him more credibility than he deserves. I am reminded of the foolish man from the tribe of Benjamin, Shimei, mentioned in 2 Samuel 16. Shimei, a member of King Saul’s family, resented David’s rule and cursed him repeatedly. Shimei cursed David, and threw stones at him and even through dung at him. One of David’s generals wanted to kill Shimei. But David chose to ignore him, and even ponder whether the Lord had some purpose in Shimei’s foolish rants and raves.

Verse 5 tells us to answer a fool…cut him down to size or he will be puffed up and may even gain influence. I am reminded of the boxing legend Cassius Clay. He had amazing speed, accuracy and strength. We know him better by the name he used later in his career, Muhammad Ali. Near the end of his boxing career, Ali began to lose much of his hand speed and some of his strength. So, he developed a strategy to weaken his opponent. Ali would stay against the ropes and cover up and let his opponent punch him until his arms got tired. He called it, “Rope a dope.” For a while it worked, but Ali took great punishment and ultimately suffered severe brain damage. The problem with “Rope a Dope” is sometimes the dope doesn’t get tired of hitting you. When the abuse reaches a certain level, it becomes necessary to answer a fool and stop the abuse. I found a very balanced statement in the Expositor’s Bible Commentary:

"-in negligible issues one should just ignore the stupid person; but in issues that matter, he must be dealt with lest credence be given to what he says (Plaut, p. 266) The text presents two sayings together that each contain an aspect of the whole truth. Whybray says they are put together to show that human problems are often complicated and cannot always be solved by appealing to a single rule (Book of Proverbs, p. 152). The meaning of the two together is that one should not lower himself to the level of a fool but that there are times when the lesser evil is to speak out than be silent."

Although it appears as a contradiction, Solomon is actually presenting two sides of a coin, and both sides are a valuable part of God’s counsel in dealing with fools.